[LINK] bin Laden is dead

[Karl Auer]

On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:51 +1000, Darrell Burkey wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:43, Karl Auer wrote:
> > You clearly think my "legal opinions" are wrong - on what basis? You,
> > too, have no qualifications.
> 
> Not at all. I just think it's odd you are only willing to consider one
> possibility using that as justification. To me this clearly indicates
> prejudice.

It's not prejudice to reach a conclusion after considering the available
information. It's called judgement. Prejudice is when one ignores (or
fails to seek or give proper weight to) information that conflicts with
a pre-existing or desired belief.

I've considered things as honestly as I am able to and have come to a
conclusion about them. Should other plausible possibilities come to
light, I'll reconsider.

> I'll have to end here as it's quite clear we won't agree on this and
> that we think much differently about it. Isn't that great? I've enjoyed
> our conversation. I'll shout you a cuppa next time I'm down your way and
> we can continue then if you like. I think an all out intellectual brawl
> at the local pub might be entertaining for the locals. :-)

Fair enough!

Regards, k.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/                   +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687
Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/attachments/20110504/05a2441c/attachment.sig>