[LINK] In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Fri Sep 9 08:34:38 AEST 2011
At 10:53 AM 5/09/2011, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
>In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores
>By MATT RICHTEL
>September 3, 2011
Fascinating article in a real world situation, not just 'supposin' '.
I hope the Australian press for standardised test scores as the
'only' valid measure doesn't fall into a similar trap. It's like
taking someone's temperature to see if their broken leg is healing. Duh.
One of the points made in the article that is definitely true: the
number of variables makes it terribly difficult to determine cause
and effect in educational research. 'Scientific' proof just doesn't
translate in these environments. At best, it's a 'best guess'
situation. Better to use a 'common sense' test and qualitative
examination rather than test scores. Education is about more than
There are other outcomes that are equally valuable, compared to the
alternative of going back to chalkboards and workbooks. Are the old
ways efficient? No. Do they allow for consistent information
presentation? (think of the teacher drawing on a chalkboard) No. Can
the teacher immediately communicate with the parents of a child as I
saw in Colorado over the last few weeks, so that the parent knows the
marks and required homework activities of their child every day? No.
Can a school send an advisory to a parent's smartphone that a school
is in lock-out because of a dangerous situation in the neighbourhood
(also observed)? No. Are those abilities valuable as well as
improving 'test scores'? I would argue yes, and I believe many
principals, teachers and parents would as well.
It's unfortunate the headline of the article sets up such a negative
attitude with equally unsupported research for their premise. I guess
the NY Times has no better sub-editors than the Australian press.
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
_ __________________ _
More information about the Link