[LINK] Now that's secure - I guess

[David Boxall]

On 3/04/2012 11:33 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Cool, spf re-action is doing what pacnet have asked for , and what I
> want it too, thanks for confirming it all still works as anticipated
> (but of course i've know that for many many many years)
> ...
Noel,

Wiser heads than mine have pointed out substantial shortcomings in SPF. 
I don't really care about the occasional rejected message. If a message 
is important enough, the issues are easily circumvented.

That you evidently employ SPF explains your devotion, but doesn't excuse 
your behaviour. The puerile -
 > It's so simple even a child could understand it.
gave reason to suspect;
and the whining -
 > those that can only make personal attacks simply
 > because one says something one disagrees with.
tends to confirm "Noel Butler" as a pseudonym of Tom Koltai.

-- 
David Boxall                    |  For when the One Great Scorer comes
                                |  To mark against your name,
http://david.boxall.id.au       |  He writes-not that you won or lost-
                                |  But how you played the game.
                                                      --Grantland Rice