[LINK] Now that's secure - I guess

[Noel Butler]

On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:45 +1100, David Boxall wrote:


> Which indicates that the best course might be for your provider to stop 
> using SPF. Good luck with that.
> 


Rubbish...


If you do not like the restrictions (hey it *IS* their domain name you
are using afterall), and given as you claim to have your own domains,
why not use one of them, and configure SPF correctly, or since you
disprove, perhaps with softfail or not at all, forwarding? well to your
own domain one would hope one is clever enough to whitelist their own
addresses - It's so simple even a child could understand it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/attachments/20120331/7a4e5b9e/attachment.sig>