[LINK] Is it really that good?!
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
brd at iimetro.com.au
Sat Sep 22 12:15:38 AEST 2012
On 21/09/2012 3:31 PM, grove at zeta.org.au wrote:
> Am I truly going loopy in my too-cold room at the end of the corridor
> - are these methodologies that brilliant that everyone truly adores
> them so much?
No and no.
Join the club of curmudgeonly skeptics.
ITIL and other such methods came from the physical manufacturing world.
In that world, highly repetitive actions can be measured and improved
using a whole range of techniques. The UK government built the library
based upon work by W. Edwards Deming who used statistics to improve
production management.
Lean, Six Sigma are but other techniques. However, as Wikipedia says:
about Lean Six Sigma (yes, its a combination of both) "(it) results in
the elimination of the seven kinds of wastes/muda (classified as
Defects, Overproduction, Transportation, Waiting, Inventory, Motion and
Over-Processing) and provision of goods and service"
ITIL came about by applying such quality management tools to IT operations.
The fundamental flaw in the whole thinking is that IT operations is not
the same as the production of physical goods. But that doesn't stop the
evangelists applying the solution for one problem to a different
problem. Think hammer, nail.
IMHO, you are totally correct in your conclusions. But don't expect the
people you work for to thank you for pointing out that the emperor has
no clothes.
As to why there is silence on the interwebs regarding the failings of
ITIL, I don't know the answer.
I'm busy trying to highlight the insanity of failed IT projects
(currently estimated at over $USD3Trillion per year), but not getting a
lot of traction yet. IMHO, it's exactly the same issue - too often the
solution doesn't match the problem.
Once I've had a good go at insulting Enterprise Architects, I'll
probably have a try at the ITIL crowd. But not this week.
--
Regards
brd
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Canberra Australia
email: brd at iimetro.com.au
web: www.drbrd.com
web: www.problemsfirst.com
More information about the Link
mailing list