[LINK] A bizarre twist on a twist - unreal online persona hi-jacked
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
brd at iimetro.com.au
Thu Apr 18 14:12:17 AEST 2013
On 18/04/2013 12:22 PM, Jan Whitaker wrote:
> http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/sharing-and-losing-control-of-an-online-persona/48027
>
> I'm not sure I follow all that happened here, but the jumble of what
> is real and what isn't or wasn't is an interesting perspective on
> what is reality in social media anyway.
>
Jan,
Rule #1 for any information system (and that includes the human mind) is:
Never assume that data in a system reflects reality.
Given that rule, then a statement like "a real online persona" is
meaningless and therefore so is "an unreal online persona".
In the physical world, when "facts" really matter, e.g. in a court of
law, there are extensive and convoluted procedures to be followed so
that a judge and jury (if there is one) can establish the probability of
a correct decision.
There is no equivalent in the digital universe and it is arguable that
equivalent extensive and convoluted procedures can be developed. There
are some environments (commerce and government mainly) where the risks
can be reduced, but not eliminated. It all comes down to risk management
in an uncertain environment. I'll happily risk a couple of hundred
dollars to buy something on-line but I'd think twice about anything that
risks thousands of dollars.
The great unwashed don't have the same perspective re the risks as I do
and gaily assume that the digital universe is as certain as the physical
world. Is that their fault? Has anybody really explained these things to
them? Would they believe the message? Considering what many people
believe about the real world, I somehow doubt it.
Maybe that will change. Maybe not.
--
Regards
brd
Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Sydney Australia
email: brd at iimetro.com.au
web: www.drbrd.com
web: www.problemsfirst.com
Blog: www.problemsfirst.com/blog
More information about the Link
mailing list