[LINK] Open publishing strike - editorial board resigns
Jan Whitaker
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
Sun Mar 31 09:48:44 AEDT 2013
This is an interesting take on the tensions between commercial
scientific/research journals (the words in the story, which is a clue
in itself) and the value of sharing knowledge/research findings in a
timely fashion. Nice to see Colin Steele quoted. Colin, are you still on Link?
http://theconversation.com/journal-editorial-board-quits-over-open-access-principle-13086
This model is broken. Authors should never pay to have their work
published. It's a cardinal rule of creative effort. Anything that
smacks of charging, in the fiction world at least, is vanity
publishing. In the scholarly world, the publishers are getting free
editorial peer review as well, and then charging the universities a
second fee to access the information. Solution: cut out the
middle-man and have scholarly associations do the peer review and
publish direct. It's time to ask the serious question of what value
the Taylor and Francis's of the world bring to the table any more.
The comments are also worth a read where Taylor and Francis Australia
tries to talk their way out of the problem of their own making. It's
full of TLAs and jargon that only they would understand -- spin. John
Harrison nails it.
Jan
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
_ __________________ _
More information about the Link
mailing list