[LINK] Surveillance

jore community at thoughtmaybe.com
Sat Nov 23 00:25:30 AEDT 2013


On 22/11/2013 11:03 PM, stephen at melbpc.org.au wrote:
> ... we're NOT talking the same
> computers & communication methods. And, we're already using it quite often.
> Also, worldwide, there's now a huge scientific effort into quantum science.

Okay, maybe so, but we're still talking computers and digital
communication---and who has the upper hand in that? Answered of course:
> This encrypting strategy is already being used by some government agencies 
> and banks. 

Precisely. The advantage is for those guys, it ain't for us. Sure it
might "trickle down" as they say, but they're always one step ahead as
they own/run/control this stuff which means they'll still have the
monopoly on surveillance, eavesdropping and control of networks with or
without fancy new tech. This is what I mean about more of the same. More
technology does not/will not/cannot solve the problems that technology
creates. Go Einstein! "We cannot solve our problems with the same
thinking we used when we created them."

Best,
Jore





More information about the Link mailing list