[LINK] Online piracy action soon?
David Boxall
linkdb at boxall.name
Tue May 6 08:59:02 AEST 2014
On 5/05/2014 10:10 AM, Jan Whitaker wrote:
>
> Online piracy crackdown looms
> Madeleine Heffernan
> Published: May 5, 2014 - 8:29AM
>
> Media industry lobbying against online piracy is intensifying, amid
> growing expectations the Abbott government will move shortly to clamp
> down on internet service providers ...
The Pirate Party responds with a petition:
<https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/stop-blaming-consumers-for-the-outdated-business-models-of-the-media-industry>
and a statement:
<http://pirateparty.org.au/2014/05/05/theres-nothing-the-coalition-wont-put-a-price-on-internet-censorship-sponsored-by-hollywood/>
There’s nothing the Coalition won’t put a price on: Internet censorship
sponsored by Hollywood
Posted on May 5, 2014
Pirate Party Australia is appalled by the news that the Abbott
Government is allegedly considering proposals to introduce legislation
to institute Internet censorship and a graduated response
(“three-strikes”) regime in an ill-conceived attempt to curb the
incidence of unlawful file-sharing[1].
“There is no public support for this proposed legislation,” commented
Simon Frew, President of Pirate Party Australia. “Why would the public
support blocking of one of the few means of access to content in this
broken digital economy?
“Prior to the election this wasn’t even being discussed. However, the
Government is bringing the proposal back to the table following
donations of more than $300,000 from Village Roadshow in the last
financial year[2]. It has also come to light that a key industry
lobbyist has had privileged access to staff at the Attorney-General’s
Department[3]. This may be coincidence, but it looks suspicious that
file-sharing is now prominent on the Government’s agenda, while there
has been no observed movement on recommendations from the Australian Law
Reform Commission regarding genuinely important areas of copyright reform.”
In January this year, the Netherlands Court of Appeal in the Hague ruled
that blockades of the Pirate Bay were ineffective and easy to
circumvent, and that ISPs were no longer required to block access to the
popular torrent site[4]. In addition, studies in Australia and around
the world have cast doubt on the efficacy of graduated response regimes,
with a paper from Rebecca Giblin of Monash University’s Faculty of Law
concluding that there is “little to no evidence” graduated responses
deter or reduce copyright infringement[5][6]. Despite similar
legislation being introduced in a number of countries to date, no
evidence has emerged that these have resulted in lowering file-sharing
behaviour, nor do they offer any significant protections for content
providers.
As legal options for accessing content increase, file-sharing has been
shown to decrease. It has been reported in several countries including
the United States[7], Canada[8] and Norway[9] that access to services
such as Netflix and Spotify has dramatically reduced file-sharing by
more than 50% in some instances[10][11].
“Censorship does not work. Three-strikes regimes do not work.
File-sharing is not theft. Business models need to be changed or adapted
to meet contemporary demands. Blocking access to websites and
disconnecting users from the Internet are misguided attempts to placate
lobbyists which have no proven benefits,” Mr Frew concluded.
“If the Government is really struggling to find effective measures to
solve some of Australia’s digital economic woes, perhaps they could take
a serious look at the recommendations from the IT Pricing Inquiry[12]
and the ALRC Copyright review[13],” said Brendan Molloy, Councillor of
Pirate Party Australia.
Pirate Party Australia is prepared for achieving appropriate copyright
reform to be a long campaign, but remains optimistic that with
consistent questioning of the influence of corporate interests there
could be a positive outcome for the Australian public.
[1]
<http://www.smh.com.au/business/online-piracy-crackdown-looms-20140505-37r3g.html>
[2]
<http://www.zdnet.com/film-studios-outspend-tech-companies-in-political-donations-7000025866/>
[3]
<http://www.zdnet.com/film-lobby-emails-detail-persistence-for-copyright-crackdown-7000028324/>
[4]
<http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/29/pirate-bay-ban-lifted-in-netherlands-as-blocking-torrent-sites-ruled-ineffective>
[5] <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2380522>
[6] <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2322516>
[7]
<https://torrentfreak.com/netflix-is-killing-bittorrent-in-the-us-110427/>
[8]
<http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/09/18/netflix-canada-piracy-down_n_3947633.html>
[9]
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10187400/Spotify-and-Netflix-curb-music-and-film-piracy.html>
[10] <http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-24108673>
[11]
<http://torrentfreak.com/music-piracy-continues-to-decline-thanks-to-spotify-110928/>
[12]
<http://www.cnet.com.au/it-pricing-inquiry-verdict-australia-is-consistently-ripped-off-339345012.htm>
[13]
<http://www.alrc.gov.au/news-media/media-release/alrc-releases-copyright-report>
--
David Boxall | Drink no longer water,
| but use a little wine
http://david.boxall.id.au | for thy stomach's sake ...
| King James Bible
| 1 Timothy 5:23
More information about the Link
mailing list