[LINK] RFI: Spam-registration of IP-addresses
Roger Clarke
Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au
Tue Nov 24 11:57:35 AEDT 2020
Many thanks to the several people who pointed me to the SPF entry!
Chris Maltby's explanation (all-but) nailed the problem.
Changing the SPF entry to ip4:103.27.32.0/24 fixed Yahoo.
But my Rocketmail mate still gets my messages thrown into Junk.
VentraIP responded, and recommended a different SPF entry:
v=spf1 +a +mx +include:spf.hostingplatform.net.au ~all
That also appears to work for Yahoo, but also not for Rocketmail.
I've looked into DMARC and inserted:
TXT v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=roger.clarke at xamax.com.au
That ought to generate a rejection-message that might help with
debugging; but it hasn't so far.
I was vaguely been aware of SPF and DMARC but had never looked at them.
Only 0.1% of my correspondents use Rocketmail, and he's said he also
found a telco invoice in his Junk-folder this morning ...
Thanks Chris and others!
_______________
WAS:
TXT v=spf1 ip4:103.27.32.5 +include:retailspf.smtp.com ?all
CHANGED TO:
TXT v=spf1 ip4:103.27.32.0/24 +mx +a ~all
The old one says to trust email that comes from a specific IP-address.
The new one says to trust it if it comes from a range of IP-addresses.
The SMTP-server operator has big volumes, and uses multiple addresses.
CHANGED AGAIN TO:
v=spf1 +a +mx +include:spf.hostingplatform.net.au ~all
Both new entries *ought* to leave no clues for Rocketmail's Artificial
Stupidity to trip over - although the first works only if ISP's
wholesale provider stays within that range of IP-addresses. Networked
business topologies are *so* much more efficient, right??
_______________________
On 22/11/20 1:12 pm, Chris Maltby wrote:
> I'm not sure that your xamax.com.au SPF details are good.
>
> xamax.com.au: "v=spf1 *ip4:103.27.32.5* +include:retailspf.smtp.com ?all"
> retailspf.smtp.com: "v=spf1 ip4:192.40.160.0/19 ip4:74.91.80.0/20 ~all"
>
> but the sending address at syd.hostingplatform.net.au is 103.27.32.232.
> You could try changing the ip4:103.27.32.5 to ip4:103.27.32.0/24.
>
> You might also want to set up a DMARC record so that you can receive
> reports of messages that fail SPF/DKIM/ARC checks.
>
> Yahoo is one of the fussiest, but also seems to permit the most real spam...
>
> Chris
>
> On 21/11/2020 7:14 am, Roger Clarke wrote:
>> If anyone can point me to relevant sources to help me understand and
>> address the following problem, I'd be very appreciative!
_______________________
Roger Clarke mailto:Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au
T: +61 2 6288 6916 http://www.xamax.com.au http://www.rogerclarke.com
Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science Australian National University
More information about the Link
mailing list