[LINK] Working at home
Tom Worthington
tom.worthington at tomw.net.au
Wed Aug 4 08:44:33 AEST 2021
On 2/8/21 4:09 pm, Stephen Loosley wrote:
> Should employers pay for home internet during remote work? by R.
> Dallon Adams in CXO on July 28, 2021, 6:07 AM PST
> https://www.techrepublic.com/article/should-employers-pay-for-home-internet-during-remote-work/
Finally, back to something on topic for Link! ;-)
Employers should pay for worker's Internet at home. But they should be
careful of the precedent set.
If the worker can do their job from home, there is no need for the
employer to pay for office space. Some organizations already don't have
reserved seating for staff. That could be extended to the point where
the if the employee wants to come to work, they have to pay for space.
> ... "video calls freezing" (34%) ...
I am surprised that video conference software companies have not done
more to prioritize audio. Zoom is best at this. Most of the time it
doesn't matter if video freezes, provided the audio still works. Where
possible, on my low speed home broadband, I use audio dial-up for video
conferences. The sound comes over the phone and is combined with the
video via the Internet. This way, if the video freezes, or is lost
completely, the audio keeps working. At worst, the participants see my
stock photo, rather than the live me.
https://blog.highereducationwhisperer.com/2020/10/tuning-zoom-videoconferencing-for-slow.html
> "When collaboration was asynchronous (email, voice mail, etc.), the
> quality of the connectivity wasn't really an issue ...
Most collaboration is asynchronous and you should have an
asynchronous fallback anyway. I designed a course this way a decade
before COVID-19 and this approach worked fine when the pandemic hit. The
idea is you provide documents in advance of any meeting (or class) and
ways to interact using text forums. The live F2F or video events are
then just an optional extra.
When I run a committee for government, academia or professional bodies,
I wage a war against "meetings" by making decisions asynchronously.
Circulate papers and then have a poll. If there is a clear
majority in favor of an action, then there is no need for a meeting.
This also works well during long large formal meetings. You can use tech
to make decisions silently on upcoming matters, and then quickly tick
them as completed without any discussion when they come up on the agenda.
--
Tom Worthington, MEd FHEA FACS CP IP3P http://www.tomw.net.au
+61(0)419496150
TomW Communications Pty Ltd. PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Prof. Standards Legislation
Honorary Lecturer, Computer Science, Australian National University
https://cecs.anu.edu.au/research/profile/tom-worthington
More information about the Link
mailing list