[LINK] Does current AI represent a dead end?

[Stephen Loosley]

Kim writes,

> So, is there hope? I believe, though I would be happy to be proved wrong on this
> — that current generative AI systems represent a dead end, where exponential
> increases of training data and effort will give us modest increases in impressive
> plausibility but no foundational increase in reliability. I would love to see
> compositional approaches to neural networks, hard as it appears.


Kim, thanks for this interesting post, was wondering if you might expand on your
above-mentioned "compositional approaches to neural networks," if you've time.

Thanks also to Roger & Kate for equally interesting responses. Both are most apt!

Cheers