[LINK] Top posting is evil [was Re: vip-l: Electronic votiing]
Kim Holburn
kim at holburn.net
Thu Nov 16 16:14:50 AEDT 2006
Actually trim posting is best
<http://www.palmyanoff.com/trimpost.htm>
or Inline replying:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Inline_replying
(or side posting ;-)
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-September/
msg03420.html>
On 2006/Nov/16, at 3:47 PM, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Rick Welykochy wrote:
>> Craig Sanders wrote:
>>
>> > ps: top-posting is evil. replies go underneath quoted material,
>> not above it.
>>
>> Couldn't agree with you more. Someone's sig even demonstrates how
>> ridiculous tand disinformative top posting is.
>
> The one that goes:
>
> A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
>> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> My question is: how many Linkers have read RFC 1855??
>
> ps. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855>
>
> -andyf
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
--
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +61 2 61258620 M: +61 417820641 F: +61 2 6230 6121
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Cacert Root Cert: http://www.cacert.org/cacert.crt
Aust. Spam Act: To stop receiving mail from me: reply and let me know.
Use ISO 8601 dates [YYYY-MM-DD] http://www.saqqara.demon.co.uk/
datefmt.htm
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link
mailing list