[LINK] EMF Health problems

Geoffrey Ramadan gramadan at umd.com.au
Mon Jun 4 12:28:04 AEST 2007


Jan Whitaker wrote:
> At 10:49 PM 3/06/2007, Geoffrey Ramadan wrote:
>> I am not suggesting that we ignore or don't continual research, but to 
>> put things in perspective.
> 
> I'm sure the asbestos industry used the same argument at one stage. You 
> don't do your position any good at all by comparing to those other 
> activities. It puts nothing in perspective whatsoever, regardless of the 
> effects of EMF.


To make it very clear what I am saying, it appears after many many years of 
research and what appears to be 1000's of experiments, they have found, if 
anything, only a very weak causal link between EMF and health.

i.e. it appears to be a very low risk. ... and much lower risk than many other 
high risk things that people appear to care less about.

In regards to asbestos and health, they have identified a very strong 
causational link. The evidence points to asbestos leading to health problems.

Based on the evidence, you cannot say this about EMF.

Reg
Geoffrey Ramadan




> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> Jan Whitaker
> JLWhitaker Associates, Melbourne Victoria
> jwhit at janwhitaker.com
> business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
> personal: http://www.janwhitaker.com/personal/
> commentary: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
> 
> Writing Lesson #54:
> Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for guests. 
> - JW, May, 2007
> 
> 'Seed planting is often the most important step. Without the seed, there 
> is no plant.' - JW, April 2005
> _ __________________ _
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link



More information about the Link mailing list