[LINK] EMF Health problems
Geoffrey Ramadan
gramadan at umd.com.au
Mon Jun 4 12:28:04 AEST 2007
Jan Whitaker wrote:
> At 10:49 PM 3/06/2007, Geoffrey Ramadan wrote:
>> I am not suggesting that we ignore or don't continual research, but to
>> put things in perspective.
>
> I'm sure the asbestos industry used the same argument at one stage. You
> don't do your position any good at all by comparing to those other
> activities. It puts nothing in perspective whatsoever, regardless of the
> effects of EMF.
To make it very clear what I am saying, it appears after many many years of
research and what appears to be 1000's of experiments, they have found, if
anything, only a very weak causal link between EMF and health.
i.e. it appears to be a very low risk. ... and much lower risk than many other
high risk things that people appear to care less about.
In regards to asbestos and health, they have identified a very strong
causational link. The evidence points to asbestos leading to health problems.
Based on the evidence, you cannot say this about EMF.
Reg
Geoffrey Ramadan
>
> Jan
>
>
> Jan Whitaker
> JLWhitaker Associates, Melbourne Victoria
> jwhit at janwhitaker.com
> business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
> personal: http://www.janwhitaker.com/personal/
> commentary: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
>
> Writing Lesson #54:
> Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for guests.
> - JW, May, 2007
>
> 'Seed planting is often the most important step. Without the seed, there
> is no plant.' - JW, April 2005
> _ __________________ _
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
More information about the Link
mailing list