[LINK] Email Obfuscation Helps Spammers: Google returns 27 million results for "* at * dot com"
Kim Holburn
kim at holburn.net
Sun Jun 17 14:23:01 AEST 2007
http://typewriting.org/2006/06/19/Email_Obfuscation_Helps_Spammers/
> Email Obfuscation Helps Spammers
>
> Some people think email obfuscation is a good way to fight spam,
> that it's somehow more difficult for spammers to understand
> "account at domain dot com" or "account&64;domain.com" than
> "account at domain.com". These people are wrong. They will often
> readily admit that they don’t think email obfuscation will stop all
> spam, but it still makes them feel like they’re doing something in
> the war on drugs terrorism spam. Here's what they're doing: in
> addition to making email more difficult for legitimate uses,
> they're actually making it easier for spammers.
>
> Google returns 27 million results for "* at * dot com". That's 27
> million email addresses waiting to be spammed. Google doesn’t allow
> you to search for the "@" sign, so that’s 27 million email
> addresses that wouldn’t be available on Google if they were not
> obfuscated. Email obfuscation not only doesn’t hurt spammers — it
> actually helps them. Where it doesn’t make it easier, it acts as a
> placebo, making people feel more comfortable and complacent living
> in a world of spam. Like everything else, if you don’t want your
> email address publicly-available, don’t put it on the public web.
> But if we want to be able to publish email addresses on the web, we
> can’t continue this half-hearted war on spam, hiding under our beds
> of obfuscation and hoping they won’t find us.
> Posted by Scott Reynen on Jun 19, 2006 — 4:08 pm | 21 comments |
> Tags: email spam
--
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3494957443
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link
mailing list