[LINK] Theft, copyright, larceny...
Rick Welykochy
rick at praxis.com.au
Wed Jun 27 12:51:21 AEST 2007
Stewart Fist wrote:
> Then in another posting Adam writes:
>
>> However, recently, a woman in Sydney was jailed for copyright
>> breaches. Although she was jailed for taking money from consumers
>> for pirated products.
>
> Did anyone attack his use of "pirated products"? >
> Or was it a useful term to explain the idea he was expressing?
It would have been impossible for me to comment. Mr Toad was killfiled
by me some five years ago. What bliss!
I now hereby attack the phrase "pirated products". It implies that
some sort of booty was gained by acts of piracy, i.e. stand-over
tactics at gunpoint, the use of force and weapons and possibly murder.
> I, for one, will continue to use "theft" and "piracy" when writing for
> public consumption, despite attempts on the Link to impose legalistic
> euphemisms.
Go ahead. You are contributing to the shaping of thought by
apprehending the language.
In my lingo, "piracy" when referring to copyright violations is
an "anti-euphemism" meant to instill a deeper loathing of the
crime than is warranted.
It has been said that "theft is theft". May I add that "newspek
is newspeak".
cheers
rickw
--
_________________________________
Rick Welykochy || Praxis Services
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking
about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
-- George W Bush, Washington DC, 20040805 (http://www.dubyaspeak.com/)
More information about the Link
mailing list