[LINK] Theft, copyright, larceny...
Stilgherrian
stil at stilgherrian.com
Wed Jun 27 17:25:10 AEST 2007
On 27/6/07 5:08 PM, "Janet Hawtin" <lucychili at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Stilgherrian <stil at stilgherrian.com> wrote:
>
>>> (most shareware is junk, anyway...and isn't worth using, let alone buying)
>> Well, Sturgeon's Law applies to shareware as much as anything else... ;)
>
> I keep coming across people who choose to define software as closed and
> shared.
> Shareware being closed code projects which are offered on a
> conditional free basis?
>
> Open source and free software are not 'shareware' they are projects
> based around transparency of code and freedom to participate, they may
> also be cash free.
>
> Not sure which flavour of word use this is but these days the word
> shareware makes my
> word politics filter beep.
No, it's just me showing my age... or at least in the way I'm using the
word. Since I think I'm using the word the same way Craig is, maybe he's
showing his age too. ;)
This "shareware" is just the old "try before you buy" style of software
distribution -- a time-limited demo, if you like, with or without technical
enforcement of the time limit.
Whether the source code is open or closed is a different axis of
measurement.
However, you have triggered an idea for an article on semantic tagging in
this realm -- stay tunes.
Oh, Janet, and I'll add my voice to those saying "Thank you for adding such
clarity to the debate the last little while."
Stil
--
Stilgherrian http://stilgherrian.com/
Internet, IT and Media Consulting, Sydney, Australia
mobile +61 407 623 600
fax +61 2 9516 5630
ABN 25 231 641 421
More information about the Link
mailing list