[LINK] Other forms of copyright theft
Kim Holburn
kim at holburn.net
Thu Jun 28 17:25:50 AEST 2007
This ISP is deleting everyone's files, assuming them to be copied
illegally. Is this copyright theft?
<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-isp-as-copyright-cop-
aussie-isp-kills-all-user-multimedia-files-nightly.html>
> ISP as copyright cop: Aussie ISP kills all user multimedia files
> nightly
>
> By Eric Bangeman | Published: June 27, 2007 - 09:01AM CT
>
> Envision a world where your ISP does the copyright policing at the
> behest of the movie studios, television networks, and music labels,
> where no copyrighted content stays up on a user's account for more
> than 24 hours. It sounds like a dream for Big Content, but it's
> also a nightmare for customers of Australian ISP Exetel.
>
> An Exetel support page which features the top ten support questions
> from the previous month. A frequently asked question from customers
> is why their multimedia files keep disappearing from their
> accounts. Exetel says that it takes a "hard approach to copyright
> issues," and since April 2005 the ISP has run a script that deletes
> all multimedia content with common extensions
> including .avi, .mp3, .wmv, and .mov.
>
> That would certainly have the effect of removing any copyrighted
> content that shouldn't be there, but it also makes it hard for
> customers to share their own slideshows, home movies, and music,
> because, as Boing Boing notes, Exetel will automatically delete
> content that isn't infringing. "Sorry you can't watch the clips of
> Junior's footy match, mum. My ISP nuked it last night."
>
> Customers can opt out of the nightly multimedia sweep by sending an
> e-mail asking that their accounts be exempt from the automatic
> nuking. In order to preserve files from automatic deletion, the
> account-holder needs to affirm that he or she is indeed the
> copyright holder of the files, that there is no copyright on the
> files, or that the copyright holder has granted permission for the
> files to be hosted.
>
> NBC/Universal general counsel Rick Cotton would love this. Last
> week, he called for ISPs to spend more of their time spying on
> users while suggesting that Safe Harbor provisions protecting ISPs
> for liability in the case of users posting copyrighted materials be
> stripped from the law. Cotton believes that service providers do
> only the bare minimum necessary to comply with the DMCA. He'd like
> to see broadband ISPs forced to use "readily available means to
> prevent the use of their broadband capacity to transfer pirated
> content."
>
> AT&T broadband customers take note: this is what the future may
> look like for you. AT&T has said that it plans to develop and
> deploy the means to keep illicit copyrighted material off its
> network. Chances are that it will be a far more sophisticated tool
> than Exetel's automated script, possibly something along the lines
> of traffic-shaping hardware that is able to detect what protocol is
> being used by looking at the packets.
>
> Australian law may be one reason that Exetel is so aggressive about
> copyright enforcement, but the ISP's approach of treating its
> customers as being "guilty until proven innocent" is disturbing. If
> Big Content gets its way, it's an approach that will become more
> common.
--
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3494957443
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the Link
mailing list