[LINK] Digital copyright: it's all wrong
Antony Barry
tony at tony-barry.emu.id.au
Tue Jun 10 16:16:56 AEST 2008
Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: info at caslon.com.au
> Date: 10 June 2008 3:48:09 PM
> To: link at mailman1.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: [LINK] Digital copyright: it's all wrong
>
>
>> Mmm,
>>
>> I started having problems with copyright when:
>>
>> a) Hollywood copyrighted classic English works of fiction (Bronte
>> Sisters et alia) simply because they had done a film based on them.
>
> Except that of course Hollywood (or Bollywood) has not copyrighted
> those works. It hasn't copyrighted the plots or the words in the
> Bronte novels (or in Shakespeare, Milton, Plato, The Bible, Das
> Kapital etc).
>
> The copyright instead relates to musical scores (original or
> licensed), the performance of the score, the script, the succession
> of images we call a cinematograph film etc
>
> That bundle of copyrights relates to the very considerable
> investment required to make a succession of feature films.
>
> It also - and heaven forbid we should actually respect creativity -
> relates to recognition of the creators ... the scriptwriter,
> composer etc, not all of whom can/want to make a living busking or
> as an academic
>
> If we're going to denounce copyright, let's do so on an informed
> basis rather than resorting to digital jingoism such as "it's all
> wrong"
>
> --
>
>
phone : 02 6241 7659 | mailto:tony at Tony-Barry.emu.id.au
mobile: 04 3365 2400 | mailto:tony.barry at alianet.alia.org.au
http://tony-barry.emu.id.au
More information about the Link
mailing list