[LINK] Beechwood homes and IP
rchirgwin at ozemail.com.au
Thu Jun 19 08:53:05 AEST 2008
Brendan Scott wrote:
> Richard Chirgwin wrote:
>> I've long thought that people in general didn't care about questions of
>> copyrights and patents because such things are too remote from everyday
>> It's interesting to see that people caught up in the Beechwood Homes
>> collapse are now running into the nasty end of copyright law. They're
>> being told they can't go ahead and build their homes with some other
>> builder, because the plans they paid for are actually the copyright
>> property of Beechwood.
>> It will be interesting to see whether something that clearly brings
>> copyright politics to the kitchen table will have any impact on
>> law-making attitudes... And to people who lobby over IP issues, I would
>> remark that you've never had a better issue given as a gift.
> In theory if they've paid for the plans, then they probably have a licence to use them to build the house to which the plans relate. The problems are these: first, that there has been so much propaganda about copyright over the last 20 years that third parties are now scared of honouring that licence; and second the legislature has so inflated the consequences of copyright infringement that being wrong results in a disproportionate penalty.
And third, organisations are accustomed to exaggerating their claims ...
I agree that the customers should have a license to use the plans; I
hope people weren't fools enough to let the contracts assign rights to
the plans to the builder.
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
More information about the Link