[LINK] Bizarre lameness in Microsoft Excel 2002
David Lochrin
dlochrin at d2.net.au
Thu Nov 6 10:08:26 AEDT 2008
On Thursday 06 November 2008 09:09, Marghanita da Cruz wrote:
> My personal preference was Fortran for aggregating data with Lotus 123
> for graphs, over MSExcell 20 years ago. Now I rely on AWSTATS and
> sometimes use Open Office to analyse my site logs. I have ocassionally
> got a message about truncating the data because it exceeded the capacity.
> This was the problem with MSExcell 20 years ago but not for 123. Though
> I think this may be related to [computer] memory usage - Excell was
> Windows based and 123 ran on DOS.
OpenOffice V2.0.4 seems to handle 622-character text strings fine - I've just tried it.
But ahh, Fortran!! Fortran is still going strong, and there have been Fortran95 & Fortran2003 releases, and I think Fortran2008 is coming (or here already?). It's now a thoroughly modern language and supports object-oriented code, recursive procedures, dynamic memory allocation, and all sorts of goodies. There seems to be a good article in Wikipedia.
David
More information about the Link
mailing list