[LINK] E-books: a quick calculation
Jan Whitaker
jwhit at melbpc.org.au
Sat Feb 7 11:03:55 AEDT 2009
At 10:42 AM 7/02/2009, Richard Chirgwin wrote:
>It's feasible that there's no advantage to e-books at all - even
>excluding the question of other kinds of environmental damage, such as
>toxic metals in the waste stream.
What about the 40% of print runs that are pulped? That must be part
of the equation, a big part. Waste is one of the major issues in
print publishing, as well as transport of returned unsold books = fuel.
Plus the stores themselves and their storage of product. Lights?
heating/cooling?
I reckon the jury's still out.
Jan
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jwhit at janwhitaker.com
business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
personal: http://www.janwhitaker.com/personal/
blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
~Madeline L'Engle, writer
Writing Lesson #54:
Learn to love revision. Think of it as polishing the silver for
guests. - JW, May, 2007
_ __________________ _
More information about the Link
mailing list