[LINK] BPL

[stephen at melbpc.org.au]

> OK, so we can't use the (power) lines ..


Haha, somebody should tell the ACMA then, and the companies NOW doing it.


Of the seven BPL trials currently reported on by the ACMA (Tas, NSW & Vic)

and reported here: http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/946967/pc=PC_2846

notes at 45M/bps, ONE ham operator, from ONE trial, reported interference.

  http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/lib284/measurements%20bpl%20emissions%
2011_01_2007.pdf

for which the ACMA report, "if Australia adopted the same limits as the
FCC have mandated, the emissions detected at the premises would be below
the limits,  and therefore of an acceptable level .. the levels detected
would meet FCC limits"


> .. do you mind not getting facts in the way of people's beliefs?

LINK doesn't mind at all putting facts in the way of people's beliefs :-)

BPL is important .. does anyone have any additional FACTS regarding this?


Cheers,
Stephen