[LINK] End of the filter?
david.boxall at hunterlink.net.au
Sat Aug 7 16:54:22 AEST 2010
On 7/08/2010 9:33 AM, Fred Pilcher wrote:
> Clearly Labor's number crunchers decided that they'd get more
> fundamentalist Christian votes from the filter than they'd lose...
Is it only that? I read it somewhat differently.
Labor may now be somewhere to the right of where the Liberals were under
Fraser, but their foundations are socialist. As Soviet and Chinese
experiences demonstrate, authoritarianism is consistent with the
socialist mindset. Given my own socialist leanings, I acknowledge that
with some regret.
The filter offers hope of control over information. I've heard the term
"perception management" used. That's attractive to the authoritarian
mind. Proposals to record details of web sites visited and emails sent
are consistent with that mindset. The almost manic evasion of some
questions gives another insight.
I reckon the kiddie-fiddler stuff is no more than a smokescreen. The
attraction to holy-rollers is just a bonus.
For me, the only advantage Labor has is that they're not the mob that
gave us the lunatic extremes of Work Choices.
David Boxall | "Cheer up" they said.
| "Things could be worse."
http://david.boxall.id.au | So I cheered up and,
| Sure enough, things got worse.
| --Murphy's musing
More information about the Link