[LINK] All your internets are belong to us
kim at holburn.net
Thu Nov 25 09:47:46 AEDT 2010
There's an interesting background piece here:
On 2010/Nov/25, at 8:26 AM, Jan Whitaker wrote:
> At 04:53 AM 25/11/2010, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>>> Also note, that it's most likely that routing to only one of the
>>> client or server was affected (if at all) and hence only one side of
>>> the communication would be sent the wrong way.
>> That is probable for a lot of the traffic, but certainly no guarantee
>> of all of it. We'd need to have a look at which routes were diverted
>> and which networks accepted the new routing information.
> I have a basic question, after following this thread without the
> background reading:
> Did the USDoD REALLY send strategic or sensitive national security
> information over an open network? To me, that is the stupid start of
> the problem if that is what happened. Doesn't DOD have its own Milnet still?
> Frankly, I don't care much if China is in the loop on general stuff.
> I don't trust them any less for open general traffic than any other
> country on the network. Heck, the intelligence gathering by most
> western countries and corporate interests are more repugnant.
> But a defence agency using open networks is about as daft as running
> SCADA controllers on the internet. It's just dumb.
> Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
> jwhit at janwhitaker.com
> blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
> business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
> Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
> sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
> ~Madeline L'Engle, writer
> _ __________________ _
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408 M: +61 404072753
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
More information about the Link