[LINK] NBN and the last 100 metres

Tom Koltai tomk at unwired.com.au
Tue Apr 12 17:10:46 AEST 2011



> -----Original Message-----
> From: link-bounces at mailman.anu.edu.au 
> [mailto:link-bounces at mailman.anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2011 4:34 PM
> To: Link List
> Subject: [LINK] NBN and the last 100 metres
> 
> 
> [Was: Re: [LINK] Four Corners NBN & NBN retail cost and 12 year 
> technology bell curve.]
> 
> On 2011/04/12 9:34 AM, Tom Koltai wrote:
> > As much as I like the Liberals, in this instance, Malcolm is partly 
> > wrong. The fibre needs to be rolled out. However Steven is 
> also partly 
> > wrong... Possibly the fibre could be just to the kerb and in some 
> > instances back to the node.
> >
<SNIP>
> 
> I have some questions for any NBN gurus here.
> 
> It's not clear to me where NBN fibre to homes is planned to 
> terminate. 
> It seems it will be somewhere on/in the house, but not every home has 
> easy access to the most convenient location.
> 
> 1. In suburbs/towns with existing underground ducting, the telephone 
> cable is typically ducted, and many properties will present 
> obstacles to 
> new trenches, e.g. concrete driveways, paths etc. Can fibre be pulled 
> through these narrow telephone ducts? If not, who is 
> responsible for the 
> cost of new trench work on residential property?
> 
> 2. Re Tom K's "copper/70+ GHz for the last 100-250 metres", does that 
> mean existing telephone cabling? Wouldn't that require power to each 
> home's footpath phone pit? Are you suggesting a FTTN solution 
> instead of 
> FTTH? I thought that debate was done and dusted.
> 
> 3. My existing ADSL modem and Ethernet patch panel are 
> located some 20m 
> from the external point of entry of the telephone cable to the house, 
> via telephone wiring inside the walls. The house is wired with Cat5e, 
> but I guess I'm up for some re-wiring when NBN arrives, presuming the 
> fibre terminates at the existing point of entry to the house?
> 

Firstly not an NBN guru.
Secondly they may not be able to discuss the matter in today's highly
charged pre=election political atmosphere.

You are correct in that the FTTN was upgraded by the labor party to
FTTH.

However right now, Labor needs to balance the books somehow for the May
budget.
If it doesn't the disappointed public may force an election a lot
quicker than expected.

So... If we are getting FTTN, or the Kerb.. And that saves 

8,200,000 HH's * $350 Kerb to House and $150 (CPE) then the total
savings to the NBN would be 4.1 billion and by carrying forward the
offset in capex as a current account surplus, the budget is almost
balanced.

Now the only problem is how to power the device at the Kerb splice to
run to the home or the radio device.  (Sorry Labor, I can't solve all
your probs with a single email.)
 
But we keep getting the rest of the NBN. That is a good thing.


TomK






More information about the Link mailing list