[LINK] RFC: Negative Assessment of Mozilla BrowserID

[Roger Clarke]

Roger wrote on Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:54:06 +1000
>Constructively negative comments are urgently sought on the 
>following exposure draft:
>          Reactions to Mozilla's BrowserID Proposal
>          http://www.rogerclarke.com/II/BrowserID-1107.html


Mozilla want to have a yarn with me.

I've previously said very negative things about Mozilla's recent browsers:
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2010-March/087411.html
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2010-March/087415.html
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2010-November/090443.html

But I've never done a solid analysis of their features, in order to 
be specific about their anti-consumer nature.

Can anyone point me to any such analyses?


Re HTML 5 specifically, there's the NYT article of Oct 2010:
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2010-October/089788.html


-- 
Roger Clarke                                 http://www.rogerclarke.com/

Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd      78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
                    Tel: +61 2 6288 1472, and 6288 6916
mailto:Roger.Clarke at xamax.com.au                http://www.xamax.com.au/

Visiting Professor in the Cyberspace Law & Policy Centre      Uni of NSW
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University