[LINK] The demise of Democracy [Was: US & fluorescent light bulbs]
David Boxall
david.boxall at hunterlink.net.au
Thu Jul 21 16:42:59 AEST 2011
On 18/07/2011 10:57 AM, Frank O'Connor wrote:
...
> Sadly we live in a democracy, and so do the citizens of the US.
I believe Winston Churchill once said something along the lines that the
best argument against Democracy is a brief conversation with the average
voter.
...
> And they get manipulated by the 'powers that be' ...
Godwin will probably get me for this, but the likes of Stalin, Hitler,
Mao and North Korea's Kim dynasty showed the way. John Howard refined
and adapted it for Australia's circumstances and current technologies.
...
> Our own Tony Abbot obviously subscribes to this state of affairs,...
Abbott learned at the feet of the master, then enthusiastically took on
Howard's mantle as The Great Deceiver.
> ... Last week he said that scientific evidence and impartial
> expert scientific and economic opinion was irrelevant to him ...
Thousands of scientists show that we're smart enough to figure out what
we need to do. The likes of Abbott reveal that we're not good enough to
do it.
...
> Sometimes I'm with the bogans ... and do believe that we're living at
> the 'End of Days'. ...
Abbott is playing politics with global warming. The worst-case global
warming scenario I've heard of would see humanity suffer centuries of
increasing misery, leading to extinction. I know of only one entity in
Christian mythology who might consider that a win. Abbott has devoted
himself to that entity's pleasure so consistently that I've come to
think of him as Satan's pleasure-boy.
Abbott studied for holy orders; he was evidently a man of faith. Now,
he's ignoring Christ (Mark 8:36) "For what shall it profit a man, if he
shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?". He's a pugilist; in
competition, he acknowledges few limits. That has led him to behaviour
which I consider corrupt. If he still professes faith, I wonder how he
reconciles it with his behaviour.
I'm not at all confident that the media corruption evident in the UK is
not reflected in Australia. The form of corruption may differ, but the
personalities are the same, so I'll be surprised if it isn't manifest
here. Media Watch frequently features examples of what I consider
corruption (or at least abuse of privilege) for example:
<http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3272258.htm?site=widebay>. To
characterise what some of the media does as writing crap is to give them
too much credit.
Without the nanosecond media cycle facilitated by ICT, Abbott's
hyperactive stunts would not so profoundly affect the electorate. For
the comparatively small number willing and able to effectively engage
online, ICT offers fragments of a solution. When it comes to deceiving
and manipulating the electorate at large however, it's a substantial
part of the problem.
With both politicians and media corrupting the information that flows to
the electorate, can democracy survive? The tactics are clear: subvert
the electorate, then work to bring on an early election.
I don't see many solutions that wouldn't introduce worse problems. For a
start, we might:
- ensure competition in the media by limiting concentration of
ownership; say, 10% in any market. Difficult, given media globalisation,
but worth an effort. And;
- hold those who incite accountable for the consequences. Shock jocks
say that they're expressing opinions, not reporting facts, but what they
express is usually peppered with distortions and outright lies which
their listeners too often accept as facts.
As for the End of Days, it's a toss-up what will get us first:
- global warming;
- air pollution;
- water pollution;
- water supply;
- soil degradation or
- overpopulation.
The list is not exhaustive. For what it's worth, my money's on the last.
--
David Boxall | Drink no longer water,
| but use a little wine
http://david.boxall.id.au | for thy stomach's sake ...
| King James Bible
| 1 Timothy 5:23
More information about the Link
mailing list