[LINK] Music industry backs down on piracy

Anthony Hornby anthony.w.hornby at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 16:15:05 AEST 2011


I think the problem stems from "Limited" not being the case any more ;-)
On Jun 7, 2011 3:32 PM, "Jan Whitaker" <jwhit at melbpc.org.au> wrote:
> At 08:35 AM 7/06/2011, David Boxall wrote:
>>Yes, I know the article's Australian. Does anyone doubt that it's Yankee
>>wankee behind the scenes?
>
> Not sure it's 'wankee', but it is in the US Constitution.
> Unfortunately, we don't have a protective constitution in this country.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_copyright_law
> United States copyright law governs the legally enforceable rights of
> creative and artistic works under the laws of the United States.
>
> Copyright law in the United States is part of federal law, and is
> authorized by the U.S. Constitution. The power to enact copyright law
> is granted in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, also known as the
> Copyright Clause, which states:
> The Congress shall have Power [. . .] To promote the Progress of
> Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and
> Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and
Discoveries.
>
>
>
> Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
> jwhit at janwhitaker.com
> blog: http://janwhitaker.com/jansblog/
> business: http://www.janwhitaker.com
>
> Our truest response to the irrationality of the world is to paint or
> sing or write, for only in such response do we find truth.
> ~Madeline L'Engle, writer
>
> _ __________________ _
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link



More information about the Link mailing list