[LINK] New Law for Citizen Owned Solar Power Stations in Canberra

Karl Auer kauer at biplane.com.au
Fri Mar 4 18:12:50 AEDT 2011


On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:37 +1100, Ivan Trundle wrote:
> On 04/03/2011, at 9:41 AM, Richard Chirgwin wrote:
> That's assuming that 'waste' is 'an inefficient use of power', in
> which case I'd actually push back further into the equation and
> suggest that waste is power consumed for convenience, but not for any
> real benefit

Nope. Waste is using a resource for "no real benefit" when that resource
is irreplaceable or the effects of using it are adverse.

The sun that hits my PV array generates a certain amount of power
*regardless* of what I do with it. If I am generating a surplus (over
the year, not just at any instant) then I can "waste" that excess
however I like - it is a "free" resource. Given that PV panels break
even energy-wise after about three to five years of generation, the
power is doubly free after that time.

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/                   +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687
Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/attachments/20110304/cb6673e7/attachment.sig>


More information about the Link mailing list