[LINK] bin Laden is dead

[Bernard Robertson-Dunn]

On 4/05/2011 3:44 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:59 +1000, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
>> Karl said:
>>> An argument is an argument. It's right or wrong, testable or not
>>> testable, plausible or not plausible.
>> I can't test the his argument without his definition of "the rule of law".
> It's a pretty common concept. Wikipedia has a good discussion. Like
> justice, it's an ideal rather than a state that can practically be
> obtained. I tend to the broader version, as I allow that the rule of law
> does not consist of blind unthinking obedience to the letter of the law,
> but rather the good-willed attempt to seek and apply the intent of laws;
> also that the rule of law is not confined within the borders of a
> nation.
>
> Ok, get testing!

Sorry, far too many vague concepts. We'd just end up arguing about the 
rule of law.

-- 

Regards
brd

Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Canberra Australia
email:	brd at iimetro.com.au
website:	www.drbrd.com



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1325 / Virus Database: 1500/3613 - Release Date: 05/03/11