[LINK] So is it Global Warming or is it Climate Change ? - Was - The Dangers of Exec Summaries

TKoltai tomk at unwired.com.au
Mon Jul 2 12:27:26 AEST 2012

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank O'Connor [mailto:francisoconnor3 at bigpond.com] 
> Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012 12:01 PM
> To: TKoltai
> Cc: 'Richard Archer'; link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: [LINK] The Dangers of Exec Summaries - Was - Web Crashing
> Yup,
> Just add Wikipedia and its contributors to your long long 
> long list of climate change conspirators who are all in it 
> for the money.

Sure Frank... As soon as you can name just one pro-Global Warming
Scientist that isn't on a payroll... In other words, someone retired.
Because, the converse is true, there are many no longer in the employ
who claim that Global Warming is a fraud. In fact there are many that
used to be employed that are no longer, because they said Global Warming
was a fraud.

I note that you have now changed the terminology to Climate Change...
Why is it now called Climate Change ?
Wasn't it called Global Warming ? 

It's a bit like putting 50 cents each way...  Or let me put it more
bluntly... In a casino, when punters bet on either black or red... The
only winner is the house. The Punters ALWAYS lose.  


More information about the Link mailing list