[LINK] So is it Global Warming or is it Climate Change ? - Was - The Dangers of Exec Summaries

[sylvano]

What are the state of the art online techniques and resources for people to follow up on public debates?

sylvano

On 02/07/2012, at 12:27 PM, "TKoltai" <tomk at unwired.com.au> wrote:

> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Frank O'Connor [mailto:francisoconnor3 at bigpond.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012 12:01 PM
>> To: TKoltai
>> Cc: 'Richard Archer'; link at mailman.anu.edu.au
>> Subject: Re: [LINK] The Dangers of Exec Summaries - Was - Web Crashing
>> 
>> 
>> Yup,
>> 
>> Just add Wikipedia and its contributors to your long long 
>> long list of climate change conspirators who are all in it 
>> for the money.
> 
> Sure Frank... As soon as you can name just one pro-Global Warming
> Scientist that isn't on a payroll... In other words, someone retired.
> Because, the converse is true, there are many no longer in the employ
> who claim that Global Warming is a fraud. In fact there are many that
> used to be employed that are no longer, because they said Global Warming
> was a fraud.
> 
> I note that you have now changed the terminology to Climate Change...
> Why is it now called Climate Change ?
> Wasn't it called Global Warming ? 
> 
> It's a bit like putting 50 cents each way...  Or let me put it more
> bluntly... In a casino, when punters bet on either black or red... The
> only winner is the house. The Punters ALWAYS lose.  
> 
> TomK
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link