[LINK] itNews: 'Parliament repeals .info filter'

[jim birch]

Scott Howard <scott at doc.net.au> wrote:

> Historically .info has been abused by spammers and fraudsters, both because
> it's relatively cheap (<$1 compared to ~$10 for a .com domain), and
> registering "look-alike" domains is easier as there's a lot less domains
> registered than .com.


What's really needed is a .scam domain where all these sites could go.

Hang on, on second thoughts, maybe that wouldn't work...

Jim :|