[LINK] How to Make oneself Unpopular - Was FemTechNet
stephen at melbpc.org.au
stephen at melbpc.org.au
Sat Sep 15 16:10:11 AEST 2012
Though one has nil personal knowledge/experience regarding gay-male
digital networks, it'd be a safe bet that thousands do exist. Hence,
any such fem-tech networks seem logical, fair and indeed inevitable.
Whatever, go gals. My respects to all digital minority-communities.
> Stephen,
>
> Whilst your posts are usually informative, this ones intent and sixties
>
> style call to revolution raises my hackles...
>
> On 14/09/2012 7:20 p.m., stephen at melbpc.org.au wrote:
> >> From: Melissa Gregg<melissa.gregg at sydney.edu.au>
> >> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:36:27 +0000
> >> Subject: FemTechNet - new network and teaching initiative
> >
>
> >
> > FemTechNet - new network and teaching initiative
> >
> > Colleagues:
> >
>
> > I am writing to introduce you to FemTechNet*, an international
network of
> > scholars and artists who are conceptualizing, designing, building and
> > implementing the world's first DOCC* (Distributed Online Collaborative
> > Course), a feminist rethinking and redoing of the unidirectional,
> > massive, somewhat imperialist MOOC* (Massively Open Online Course).
> > (* Please see definitions of our terms below).
> Reminds me a bit of the words to that world war 2 rallying cry (anthem)
>
> of the German people; "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles" (literally,
>
> "Germany, Germany above all") *.*
> We could just change the words, Feminists, Feminists, /über alles/
>
> >
>
> > Our DOCC, Feminist Dialogues on Technology, will be offered September-
> > December 2013, on fifteen campuses around the world, at least one each
> > per continent.
> >
> > Members of our network who do not take or teach the course can follow
and
> > participate in this pedagogic experiment in a variety of voluntary
> > capacities, small and large.
> >
>
> > First step: we request that you join our network!
> <SNIP>
>
> >
>
> > Thanks for your interest and please see terms below.
> >
>
> <SNIP>
> >
>
> > *Terms:
> >
>
> > FemTechNet is a network of hundreds of international scholars and
artists
> > who work on or with technology in a variety of fields including STS,
> > Media and Visual Studies, Art, Women's, Queer and Ethnic Studies.
> >
> >
> Which is a watered down version of their website introductory statement:
>
> Quote/ [From:https://lists.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/femtechnet]
> "Welcome to the FemTechNet listserv, a network of hundreds of
>
> international feminist scholars, students and artists who work on or
>
> with technology in a variety of fields including STS, Media and Visual
>
> Studies, Art, Women's, Queer and Ethnic Studies./Quote
>
> Yes, let's all be equal.
>
> But if you want to be a member of our little club, make sure you qualify
>
> under our "Terms"....
>
> This type of Germaine Greer activism has past it's due by date.
> In the Western world, men and women have reached an equilibrium.
> Even in the land of Blokes and mates, we have at last a woman Prime
>
> Minister.
> I doubt there is a heterosexual man anywhere in Australia that doubts
>
> even for a millisecond that women wear the longest, thickest and most
>
> expensive pants in any relationship.
>
> "Behind every successful man is a hard working woman."
>
> The only separation remaining between the sexes is those that are
>
> entrepreneurs and those that are not.
>
> Women that have an entrepreneurial bent, lead and command top flight
>
> salaries.
> Women that are not entrepreneurial, usually wind up as do
>
> non-entrepreneurial males, in supporting lesser paid roles.
>
> Unemployment levels between the sexes seesaw - (See References.) -
>
> showing an equilibrium between the sexes.
>
> Organisations that continue to draw a line and determine membership by
>
> sex, sexual preferences and ethnicity have no business in our modern
>
> society.
>
> Any organisation (in the West) that attempts to justify it's existence
>
> by calling on the "Sisterhood", the "Rainbow" or utilising the "Race
>
> Card" is merely a "hate" wedge attempting to promote the rights of one
>
> group over another.
>
> This is no longer a cry for equality. With words like :
>
> Quote/"a feminist rethinking and redoing of the unidirectional,
> massive, somewhat imperialist" /Quote
>
> Such organisations have passed the tipping point of acceptable self
>
> promotion and are bordering on being guilty of massive social injustice
>
> engineering of our next generation and their real motivations should be
>
> carefully weighed up and analysed by all free thinking honest
individual.
> Equality is attained by respect. Let us call a stop to all segregating
>
> activity that strives for equality via any type of "ism", division and
hate.
>
> Here's some news for the Feminists out there. We had the revolution, the
>
> final score was Women 60 Men 40.
> Ask the following question of any kid under thirty... "Who's in charge
>
> of your family, Mum or Dad ?"
>
> A few poignant questions to any woman who believes that she is not equal
>
> to a man;
>
> At the office, do you wear perfume, makeup, short skirts and a cross
>
> your heart lift and separate bra with a low cut blouse ?
> Do any of your girlfriends wear such accoutrement's at their place of
work ?
> Have you ever flirted with a policeman to get out of a traffic ticket ?
> Have any of your girlfriends ever flirted with a policeman to get out of
>
> a traffic ticket ?
> Have you ever flirted with a customer to land a sale ?
> Have you ever smiled at the big fat kid on the bus so you get his seat ?
>
> These are the elements that contribute to the trough of Feminist
>
> disappointment through stereo-typing.
> Removing these last barriers to gender equality will not be achieved
>
> through militant Feminist woman Gay and Ethnic only groups.
>
> References:
> Quote/:
>
>
[http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemploym
e> nt_statistics#Male_and_female_unemployment_trends]
> The annual average unemployment rates for 2009 and 2010 were
>
> consequently slighlty higher for men (9.1 % and 9.7% respectively) than
>
> for women (9.0 % and 9.6 %); in 2011 however, unemployment for males
>
> slightly declined in the EU-27, while that of women continued to
>
> increase such that the rate for males was again lower at 9.6 % than that
>
> for females (9.8 %). /Quote
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server
More information about the Link
mailing list