[LINK] Google's Driverless Car Is Worth Trillions

[Bernard Robertson-Dunn]

On 29/01/2013 12:41 PM, Jim Birch wrote:
> You might reasonably argue that the whole legal framework of responsibility
> is more of a operational mythology than grounded in reality. Who would you
> believe in a court of law, a human driver or the robot he hit?

The courts aren't about right/wrong or justice, they are about the law.

AFAIK a non human entity (other than a corporation, which comprises a 
group of humans) cannot be responsible for anything under the law. Which 
is why I asked the question, who is responsible for the actions and 
behaviour of the robot?

-- 

Regards
brd

Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Sydney Australia
email: brd at iimetro.com.au
web:   www.drbrd.com
web:   www.problemsfirst.com
Blog:  www.problemsfirst.com/blog