[LINK] Wikipedia, ontroversial science vulnerable to sabotage

Janet Hawtin janet at hawtin.net.au
Mon Aug 17 16:04:52 AEST 2015


Would be interesting to do a comparison of which media sources are more
objective and factual as a percentage.
But I expect that would be a matter of perspective too. =)

On 17 August 2015 at 15:14, Jim Birch <planetjim at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is impossible for the Wikipedia model to work well on quasi-religious
> tribal topics.  Who would seriously think otherwise?
>
> It's generally great, or the least great start, on non-controversial
> subjects, especially technical subjects.
>
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
>



More information about the Link mailing list