[LINK] Wikipedia, ontroversial science vulnerable to sabotage
Janet Hawtin
janet at hawtin.net.au
Mon Aug 17 16:04:52 AEST 2015
Would be interesting to do a comparison of which media sources are more
objective and factual as a percentage.
But I expect that would be a matter of perspective too. =)
On 17 August 2015 at 15:14, Jim Birch <planetjim at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is impossible for the Wikipedia model to work well on quasi-religious
> tribal topics. Who would seriously think otherwise?
>
> It's generally great, or the least great start, on non-controversial
> subjects, especially technical subjects.
>
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at mailman.anu.edu.au
> http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
>
More information about the Link
mailing list