[LINK] Does NBN need a third satellite?

Tom Worthington tom.worthington at tomw.net.au
Mon Mar 28 09:15:00 AEDT 2016


On 25/03/16 08:40, David Boxall wrote:

> A third? The first isn't fully operational and the second hasn't even
> launched! ...

Satellites take years to build and launch and three would seem to be a 
reasonable minimum number for the NBN to have.

Also the satellites provide a quick and easy way to provide access, 
making it politically tempting to expand the range of use.

> Didn't Turnbull say that the satellites are unnecessary extravagances?

Yes, but that was when he was in opposition, in government if you are 
committed to $1B of satellites you try to make the bast of it.

The most interesting aspect of Mark Gregory's article in the Business 
Spectator is the idea of the NBN satellites being used to provide 
broadband for passengers on Qantas aircraft. It seems reasonable for 
taxpayers to buy a satellite for outback kids education, but not for 
business class passengers watching in-flight movies: 
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2016/3/21/technology/does-nbn-need-third-satellite 



-- 
Tom Worthington FACS CP, TomW Communications Pty Ltd. t: 0419496150
The Higher Education Whisperer http://blog.highereducationwhisperer.com/
PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617, Australia  http://www.tomw.net.au
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards 
Legislation

Adjunct Lecturer, Research School of Computer Science, College of 
Engineering & Computer Science, Australian National University
http://people.cecs.anu.edu.au/user/3890 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-8464



More information about the Link mailing list