[LINK] Telstra and China Mobile
Stephen Loosley
stephenloosley at outlook.com
Fri Jul 30 19:32:51 AEST 2021
Dear Kate
> Why wouldn't they do a Ghengis Khan if they wanted and go west to the 'stans?
> Or Mongolia or Siberia? At least they're connected by land - an invasion across
> water and other unhappy countries would be guaranteed to fail. A huge *empty*
> space? Even country Chinese people need infrastructure: simply land and water
> is not enough.
Kate, having a close look at the various Chinese “Belt and Road Initiatives” amonst the
countries between Australis and China reveals a chain of ports and roads etc that form
almost a chain-link. Just ripe for transporting troops and equipment. I’ve been looking
at this happening for years.
And anyway, one medium Chinese cargo ship loaded with just a few thousand troops
would be plenty to take Darwin, and in just one day.
It would take weeks for us to respond .. plenty of time, with commandeered vehicles,
to take and hold probably every town between Darwin and Perth.
> Do you seriously think that, when needed, the stunningly inventive Chinese
> couldn't figure out water conservation and distillation techniques that would
> put our pathetic efforts to shame?
Maybe so Kate, but they haven’t yet, apparently? And zero report of any attempt.
> I think we are capable of offering vastly greater amounts of humanitarian aid
> to the world, not just China. Unfortunately, our political master don't.
Yes, one would agree Kate. In every respect.
However, in view of apparent facts, many would assert China’s problem *really* matters to us.
Cheers,
Stephen
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 08:12:36AM +0000, Stephen Loosley wrote:
> Dear Andy, Kate and Linkers ..
>
> >> ...I think Australia should offer the Chinese
> >> a sizable portion of our land.
> >
> > Jeebus! What drugs did you take this morning?
> >
> > What is the objective of this proposal? -andyf
>
>
> Andy, it’s no real secret that China will soon have insufficient water.
>
> That means 1,445,281,898 thirsty people, with few options available.
>
> That means a civil war, or an international war. Which will China choose?
>
> That means, they want a huge nearby empty space. That means, Australia.
>
> And that means, either we offer it (or sell it?) of they have to simply take it.
>
> (Another discussion is that China has been preparing for this for over a decade)
>
> There is an enormous amount of wasted top-end tropical wet season fresh water.
>
> We can and indeed should offer humanitarian aide when we can. And we can easily.
>
> It’s absolutely certain China would happily offer fair compensation to people affected.
>
> And, we avoid a war, and are looked apon as the most generous country in all of history.
>
> Seems a no-brainer to me 😊 Maybe?
>
> And yes, Kate .. China has indeed been very peaceful for most of history. However when
> 1.4 billion souls face certain civil war over water, then, another Ghengis Khan, going east
> instead of west this time, would seem absolutely certain to me.
>
> And, for example: “Nearly 2 metres of rain falls each year in Darwin alone..” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-18/why-cant-top-end-pipe-water-south-assist-drought-stricken-states/10615440
> _______________________________________________
> Link mailing list
> Link at anu.edu.au
> https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
More information about the Link
mailing list