[LINK] Electronic Voting
Saliya Wimalaratne
saliya at hinet.net.au
Fri Nov 17 10:27:54 AEDT 2006
My e-voting proposal (feel free to modify/point out problems/say you idiot):
* Voter is given randomly-generated token on 'checkin' allowing 1 vote
- token is at this stage not anonymous - tied to voter ID
* Voter votes (touchscreen, IVR+headphones+keypad, whack-a-mole)
* Voter confirms vote and it is queued for submission. Physical
confirmation generated.
- e-vote is at this stage not anonymous - tied to token.
* If voter changes mind after confirmation, redeem token
Queued vote binned, confirmation binned, return to step 1
* Voter submits physical confirmation to one box, scans/bins token
- e-vote corresponding to token is anonymised and submitted
- token <-> voter ID information deleted
- physical confirmations can be used for checking tallies
I can't see why visually-impaired people can't be provided with a
system that works for them under this regime (heck, even a numeric-keypad
menued system with headphones would work). The best person to ask to
design such a system is probably someone who is visually impaired.
A key requirement IMHO is a physical confirmation that:
* the voter can understand
* can later be counted if needed
If the voter votes visually, a printed copy should be fine for confirmation.
If they vote via audio, a recording of the entire conversation could be
made (and/or just the final selection) and burned onto mini CD, with the
vote printed on it for ease of tallying.
If they vote via whack-a-mole, the head of the candidate they voted for
could be miniaturised and given to them.
With respect to vote tampering, yes, new skillsets are needed for prevention
of tampering with e-voting. So what? Scrutineers need to be able to _read_
to count current votes... and people aren't born with the ability to read.
My goodness me.
Regards,
Saliya
More information about the Link
mailing list