[LINK] Race is on for carbon offset work
Tom Worthington
Tom.Worthington at tomw.net.au
Wed Jan 21 08:28:22 AEDT 2009
At 02:41 PM 20/01/2009, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
>The Federal Government decided to review its procurement, so it did
>the Gershon review. ... Because of the hold, for the first half of
>Fin Year 2008/09 the rate of IT spend in Canberra has been well down
>on plan. ... In the next month or so the hold will come off and
>departments will be panicking to spend ...
Given the Australian Government is short of money and wants to reduce
its carbon emissions, the logical thing to do would be to stop the
departments doing panic spending. Where spending is justified, it
could minimise cost and emissions by using the minimum of equipment.
As an example, the newspaper article you cite ("Race is on for carbon
offset work", Karen Dearne, January 20, 2009 The Australian IT
<http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,24934753-15306,00.html>)
mentions 20 new IT projects for the Department of Climate Change to
get online trading and oversight of emissions permits. This need not
involve a large spend on hardware, as the trading system will be a
tiny one, compared to something like the Australian Stock Exchange.
The trading system hardware would fit in a couple of pizza box size
units. It might make sense to run it on someone else's hardware,
rather than the Department of Climate Change, which will not have
experience in running such a system.
Similarly, the regulator will need a system to do its business, but
this need not be a separate computer system, nor one located on the
Department's premises. The regulator need not have a big office full
of desks with PCs on each. Given the regulator is to regulate an
industry, the staff could be issued with low power portable equipment
and sent out to the industry they are regulating. Their office would
only accommodate the secretariat and the other staff would assemble
occasionally at shared meeting rooms.
For bespoke software development the Department might like to adopt
the approach the Australian Research Council (ARC) took with
its Research Management System. This uses executable translatable
UML. That could be very useful for clarifying what is needed in a new
and emerging area and avoiding lots of code cutting. The Department
might even borrow the ARC in-house team
<http://www.arc.gov.au/general/rms.htm>.
Tom Worthington FACS HLM tom.worthington at tomw.net.au Ph: 0419 496150
Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 309
PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617 http://www.tomw.net.au/
Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Australian National University
More information about the Link
mailing list