[LINK] Fwd: Expert Panel: The Seven Stages of IPv6 Adoption

[Karl Auer]

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 14:12 +1100, Tom Koltai wrote:
> > Er - "look after them"? They aren't chickens, they're 
> > numbers. I really don't see what you mean here. Unless you 
> > mean the issue of over-generous distribution.
> 
> I think the concern might be - Reporting issues under the Interception
> Act.

Hm. Could you describe how the issues with IPv6 might differ from the
issues with IPv4?

> The second concern might be the nature of IPV6 lends itself to cloaked
> PVC type communicatons.

Name one way in which "IPV6 lends itself to cloaked PVC type
communications", then show how IPv6 is any different from IPv4.

> Therefore the number management becomes rather an important issue.
> Rather like - "Proof of delivery on a Registered Australia Post parcel."
> No-one outside the sender and recipient knows what's inside (apart from
> xray inspection) but we can prove that it originated from... And was
> received by .....

That may be true for IP generally, but it is not a distinguishing
feature of IPv6. If those are concerns, they are just as much concerns
now, with IPv4, as they are for IPv6.

I could be wrong, but I'm starting to smell FUD in the air...

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF