[LINK] Fwd: Expert Panel: The Seven Stages of IPv6 Adoption

Karl Auer kauer at biplane.com.au
Fri Mar 27 18:35:14 AEDT 2009


On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 07:00 +0000, stephen at melbpc.org.au wrote:
> Only that IPv6 is so huge, maybe different net management is necessary?

If other management techniques become necessary, it will be because of
innovations that we at present know nothing of. Right now there is
nothing that suggests radical new techniques will be needed.

> One is aware that acting as an ISP, MelbPC has sent emails to customers
> telling them that they appear to be virused, and are certainly spamming.

But that has nothing to do with IPv6.[1]

> I don't know if registrars, hosting companies, ISPs, or whomever, might
> be ideal watch-keepers over those new au 'territories' but, just maybe,
> new arrangements may be indicated simply because of immense numbers.

There are no new "territories", and nothing new that needs "watching
over". At least not in any new ways.

>  It
> is 'not' likely to be a popular topic for discussion, but industry self
> regulation might well need to be beefed up, given the numbers that will
> be available? I guess i want to know if this has been considered in the
> plans, before say, our Government may feel compelled to step in, in the
> event of problems. Effective industry self-regulation (paid/sponsored?)
> is better than 'after the fact' government intervention one would think.

Look, not meaning to be rude, but what *are* you faffing on about?

What specific problems do you see that would lead to regulation needing
to be beefed up? What, specifically, should be "considered"? Why,
specifically should the Government feel any need to "step in"? After
*what* fact? What, specifically, should industry be self-regulating?

> That's all i want to have clarified, for the good of all .au net users.

You appear to have a cloud of vague misgivings about IPv6. Your
misgivings seem to be rooted in a very deep ignorance of networking in
general and IPv6 in particular. I say "seem" because you might have some
other reason for not giving any details about your forebodings. In any
case, until you start articulating some specifics of what it is that you
think the problem is, no-one will be able to "clarify" anything.

Regards, K.

[1] "Virus" is not a verb.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF




More information about the Link mailing list