[LINK] Clinging to a dead biz model for dear life
kim at holburn.net
Mon May 18 17:59:17 AEST 2009
Funny but rather hard hitting article.
> For two lawyers who supposedly specialize in media and First
> Amendment law, these guys were so full of stupid I'm embarrassed for
> them. You see, they have just the legislative solutions to the
> newspaper industry's ills!
> -- Bring copyright laws into the age of the search engine.
> Taking a portion of a copyrighted work can be protected under the
> "fair use" doctrine. But the kind of fair use in news reports,
> academics and the arts -- republishing a quote to comment on it, for
> example -- is not what search engines practice when they crawl the
> Web and ingest everything in their path.
> Yeah, Google driving traffic to the newspapers' sites are the reason
> newspapers are in trouble. This line of argumentation is not only
> idiotic beyond words, but newspapers have a simple solution: block
> Google from crawling their sites with a "nofollow" "disallow" tag in
> their robots.txt file. Now if that sounds complicated to you, it's
> not: it's literally one single word in an HTML page that tells
> Google "stay the fuck out because we're too fucking stupid to want
> people to find our material via search engines!"
> Here's the problem, 1) the newspapers don't want Google to stay the
> fuck out, and 2) newspaper execs are actually not so fucking stupid
> that they want their sites blind to potential readers. The issue is,
> they want Google to PAY them for the privilege of sending people
> their direction. Why? Who knows! Maybe because they're fucking stupid?
This para caught my eye:
> Of course, it's pretty much corporate consolidation that has killed
> the newspaper biz, with big media conglomerates squeezing newspapers
> dry in the quest for 30 percent profit margins. It's no accident
> that the most stable newspapers left are generally the family owned
> ones. So the solution these guys are proposing is in fact more of
> the same that has gotten newspapers into this kind of trouble. So
> that could be considered stupid. But aside from that, if they want
> to double down on this failure, all the power to them. I'd give them
> this one.
I wonder how true that is?
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3494957443
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
More information about the Link