[LINK] 2.4Ghz is full - time to move on.
tomk at unwired.com.au
Fri May 21 07:25:56 AEST 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: link-bounces at mailman1.anu.edu.au
> [mailto:link-bounces at mailman1.anu.edu.au] On Behalf Of Jamie
> Sent: Friday, 21 May 2010 6:51 AM
> To: Link list
> Subject: [LINK] 2.4Ghz is full - time to move on.
> Hi linkers,
> I live in a small apartment in inner city Sydney. A few years
> ago I used to use a 2.4Ghz TV sender to send audio+video from
> my lounge to the bedroom - but soon found the growing
> interference a problem and had to abandon that method for
> fixed wires. As the number of nearby access points grew I
> moved my home server to a wired connection because the
> wireless was becoming unreliable. With increasing numbers of
> people getting home broadband with wireless routers, the
> problem is getting worse.
> Now I'm sitting on the couch, no more than 3m from the
> wireless router and am having the connection drop out and
> re-associate every minute or two. A quick look at my
> wireless adapter shows (currently) 28 networks, all with 2/5
> bars of signal strength or more. (and no doubt I would
> actually see many more if I used a wifi scanner program).
> My router is a slightly older b/g model (Billion7404VGP).
> I've tried tweaking every setting on both the router and
> laptop - changing both to "G only" mode and trying "interface
> robustness" and other things to no avail.... so I guess the
> next step is to upgrade to a 5Ghz A+N router..... but
> something tells me that even that will only be a temporary fix!
> Once 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz are full to the point of cross
> interference making them useless, where to next? Back to
> wires? Or ultra-high frequency ultra short-range wireless?
> Jamie Sunderland
> Business Development Manager, AARNet Pty Ltd
An interesting question.
And one that deserves an answer - I just don't have one.
Been having the same problems and that's with G and N 2.4 and 5.7 with
inteligent software to select which frequency to use to share the load
between four persons.
However, we have 14 networks visible, and constant retraining is making
the 100 mb p/s more like 10 kbs per second.
I wonder if the ACMA have a plan for future deployment possibilities.
Other countries ghave planned for expansion by using 2.4-2.7 and CDMA.
More information about the Link