[LINK] The Doherty Model

[Brendan]

On 27/8/21 1:32 pm, Kate Lance wrote:
> Wow Jan, I thought there must have been holes in the Doherty modelling, but
> that's a great read - a breathtaking dissection of the problems, especially the
> weird 180-day cutoff for the models.

He makes much of it but I think the 180 day cut off on the graphs is pretty much irrelevant. The graphs for eg. 70% coverage are not going to be worse than for the 50% case.  The purpose of the graphs is to show relative size of peaks and attack rates, which they do, even though cut off.